At what step do You have troubles?
More than a third of businesses that officials recently checked in southwest North Dakota sold discount cigarette online to minors, according to information released by the Southwestern District Health Unit on Friday.“We were very, very surprised when we saw the results,” said Tammy Hovet, Tobacco Prevention and Control project coordinator for SWDHU.Twenty-two of 63 businesses checked in eight counties sold online cigarettes to minors in September and October, she said. The data shows a sharp spike in illegal sales, since a check of 65 businesses in the same counties in June turned up...
There is a certain irony to it, some have said.Smokers in Alexandria will have to leave local discount cigarettes stores to light up the products they just bought there.At least 25 feet from the stores to be exact, starting Jan. 1 after the Alexandria City Council passed an ordinance Oct. 4 banning smoking cigarettes in businesses previously exempt from state and local smoking cigarettes bans, including bars and buy cigarettes stores.And some tobacco users are not happy."They think the City Council way overstepped their boundaries," said Vonne Neal, owner of Alexandria's Smoke Shop." With...
All of Southern University’s campuses will ban cigarettes store starting in January, the Southern Board of Supervisors decided.The move makes Southern the first college system in Louisiana to ban all cigarettes products. Nicholls State University became the first public college in Louisiana to become tobacco free at the beginning of this calendar year.Southern University System President Ronald Mason Jr. said the new policy is about promoting healthy lifestyles and setting a quality standard for all of higher education.“We’re going to look at it as the beginning of a cultural...
Little cigars, which are taking increasing space on area tobacco-shop shelves, are shaped and smoked just like cigarettes. But because New Jersey taxes them differently, they cost nearly one-third the price.Over the past several years, increased state and federal taxes have helped turn some smokers on to less-taxed cigarettes store products, local shop owners and anti-smoking cigarettes groups say.New Jersey has a $2.70 tax per cigarette pack, and the federal government has a $1.01 excise tax it enacted two years ago.That sixth-highest cigarette tax in the country may entice more smokers to...
Quitting smoking cigarettes just got a little easier. For a limited time, the California Smokers' Helpline is sending callers from Nevada County free nicotine patches. Eligible cigarettes store users who call 1-800-NO-BUTTS and enroll in the free telephone-based cessation program will receive a free two-week starter kit of patches, while supplies last.The patches are an FDA-approved treatment proven to help smokers kick the habit. They release nicotine into the bloodstream through the skin, reducing withdrawal symptoms and slowly weaning smokers off nicotine. Nevada County was one of 34...
Not since Earl Long commenced cavorting with a stripper has a Louisiana governor acted this strangely.
Bobby Jindal appears to be putting principle over political expediency, and you couldn't get much more out of character than that.
But the principle on which he has elected to stand is a highly perverse one, and his main concern remains himself. So perhaps there is no need to send for the men in white coats after all.
Jindal, in his quest to lower the price of cheap cigarettes in Louisiana, is not only bucking public opinion but setting himself up to be the first governor in decades to suffer the indignity of a legislative override. He is evidently willing to pay the price of maintaining an anti-tax stance even when it defies all reason. Say tax, and Jindal will jump up and shake his head. Pavlov would approve.
Jindal cannot be against all taxes, of course. They have paid his salary for practically the whole of his working life, and he is already 40.
The shtick which is evidently supposed to confirm Jindal's bona fides with true believers on the right is a firm opposition to any new tax. On this occasion that opposition is not so much firm as mindless, given the popular view that smokers are a blot on the landscape and should be taxed to the hilt so long as they are with us.
The tax at issue here is a new one only according to Jindal's idiosyncratic definition, for it has been in place for years. It was designated as temporary, but that was just an old Baton Rouge trick to make it more palatable. It was not that big a deal anyway -- 4 cents a pack in addition to what was already in place. Now that the 4 cents are about to expire, and smokers are used to coughing up, legislators are overwhelmingly in favor of renewal.
Both chambers voted to keep the tax in place by margins that would be enough to overcome Jindal's threatened veto. He will, of course, be leaning on a few of the more pliable members, but nobody will want to be called a friend of buy cigarettes in the next election campaign. Besides, Jindal's package has met with unprecedented resistance in this session, and many members are still smarting over his treachery in the matter of their pay raise a couple of years ago. They will relish the prospect of any embarrassment that might come his way.
The cigarette tax might well be the issue that brings them that agreeable experience, and it appears uncharacteristically imprudent for Jindal to pick a fight over it. Not only is smoking cigarettes widely regarded as abhorrent, but these are straitened times for state government. The revenue from a 4-cents-a-pack tax may be paltry -- about $12 million a year -- but any hit on the budget is going to hurt someone. Cutting discount cigarettes taxes while taking the ax, say, to higher education is not an approach likely to earn plaudits from the electorate.
Jindal does not claim any benefit from lower cigarette taxes, although it might be argued that smokers from neighboring states where prices are higher will come here to stock up. Thus, any loss to the exchequer from a veto of the tax renewal might be at least partially offset.
That would be a pretty feeble justification for cheaper smokes, although it is hard to think of any other. But smoking cigarettes is not the issue here. Jindal must figure that taking a few licks now will be worth it if there is a reward down the road, perhaps when he is running for another office. Indeed, when urging his fellow Republicans to uphold his veto of the cigarette tax, he said the issue is "personal" because he made a promise not to raise taxes.
The idea that it is against Jindal's principles to break a promise no doubt raised a smile on some of the faces present. But this promise is different, because Jindal is mad about ideological purity.
Other cigarettes news and tobacco market events you can find at links bellow:
• Cigarettes & Tobacco News
• Discount Cigarettes & Tobacco News
• CigarettesOn.Com Tobacco News
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Copyright © 2005-2012 CigarettesOn.Net